Skip to main content

§ 100 · Contracts & revision

Have your terms and conditions reviewed: what our AI finds in the T&Cs of startups and small companies in 2 minutes — and what it deliberately doesn't

Your own terms, a template from the internet or the version from a generator — how well does it hold up? We show which clauses the AI flags reliably, where it reaches its limits and when involving a lawyer who specialises in IT law is genuinely worthwhile.

6 minContracts & revision
An open contract document with a magnifying glass on a light-coloured desk — a symbol for reviewing general terms and conditions

Why review your terms and conditions at all?

Terms and conditions are not a marketing add-on. An invalid clause can mean that statutory law applies instead — often to your disadvantage. In B2C business, you also risk a warning letter from competitors or consumer-protection organisations.

Typical sources of risk that we encounter again and again in practice:

  • Impermissible exclusions of liability for intent and gross negligence.
  • Flat-rate damages clauses with no scope for adjustment.
  • Unclear or disadvantageous contract terms and automatic renewals — particularly error-prone since the recent consumer-protection reforms on contract terms.
  • Data-protection clauses in the T&Cs that really belong in the privacy policy.
  • Missing or hidden references to the European Commission's Online Dispute Resolution platform and to the right of withdrawal.
  • Place of jurisdiction and applicable law — often invalid in B2C when they depart from the consumer's place of residence.

What our AI flags reliably

  • Clauses that appear on statutory lists of invalid standard terms.
  • Contradictions between the terms and the privacy policy or legal notice.
  • Missing mandatory components for online shops and SaaS providers.
  • A risk heatmap for each clause — you can see at a glance where improvements are needed.
  • A comparison between your current version and an earlier one (clause heatmap, described here).

What the AI deliberately does not do

  • It does not write complete terms and conditions for you — why we currently decline to do this is explained here: No contract generation. We offer curated wizards for individual contract types — but no generated full texts without a final legal review.
  • It does not replace sector expertise — for example, terms for regulated markets (gambling, finance, medicine) belong in the hands of a specialist lawyer in every case.
  • It cannot replace a competition-law strategy where your terms are meant to define your position relative to competitors.

When is it worth turning to a specialist lawyer?

At the latest, when you:

  • address international customers (Rome I Regulation, local mandatory disclosures),
  • have to cover B2B and B2C in a single set,
  • launch a new product whose terms you want to use for years,
  • or have already received a warning letter.

How to proceed

  1. Upload your T&Cs file → a 2-minute initial review with a risk heatmap.
  2. Optional: add a second version → automatic version comparison.
  3. For critical findings: direct handover to verified lawyers specialising in IT law — anonymised, with a context brief.

Have your T&Cs reviewed: /vertraege/revision · For SMBs: /for-smb · What the AI can't do: /system-grenzen

Lexi, digitale Rechts-Assistenz

Ready to clarify your matter?

{n} credits free. No credit card required. Ready in 2 minutes.

Start free now

No credit card required · GDPR-compliant · Start for free

Start free
No credit card
Get started