Skip to main content

§ 99 · Context & background

Fine notice: the 14-day deadline and what the AI reviews in three minutes

A fine notice arrives in the letterbox — and on the back it says "14-day objection deadline". What counts legally as service, from when does the deadline run, and where is an objection genuinely worthwhile? An honest overview — including what our AI reviews and what it does not.

6 minContext & background
Brown envelope next to an hourglass in warm desk light — symbol for a short objection deadline

What this is about

A Bußgeldbescheid (a notice of a regulatory fine, e.g. for speeding, an illegal parking or a mobile-phone offence) is formally served in Germany — usually by registered mail with a certificate of service, the yellow envelope. From the day after service, a hard 14-day deadline runs for filing an objection (Einspruch) under Section 67 OWiG (Act on Regulatory Offences).

Anyone who misses this deadline will, as a rule, have to accept the notice — reinstatement to the previous status (Wiedereinsetzung) is possible, but it's the exception.

What counts as "served"?

  • Certificate of service (Postzustellungsurkunde): the date noted on the yellow slip counts — not the day you actually read the letter.
  • Substitute service into the mailbox: the day it was placed in the mailbox counts — even if you were on holiday.
  • Deposit at the post office: the day of the written notification counts.

Important: the day of service itself doesn't count towards the deadline; the deadline starts running the following day.

When is an objection worthwhile?

An objection is always worth considering if the notice contains formal or substantive errors — for example:

  • An incorrect description of the offence (date, location, vehicle).
  • A measurement procedure without traceable documentation, particularly for speed measurements using standardised devices — there are country-specific nuances here.
  • The wrong driver (e.g. with a photo of the registered keeper).
  • Limitation (Verjährung) questions on older matters.

What is, incidentally, not a standalone ground for success in Germany (and which our AI therefore doesn't flag as a red flag either): a missing calibration certificate (Eichschein) in the notice. Standardised measurement procedures don't have to attach the calibration certificate together with the notice — it can be inspected on request. We keep this and similar jurisdiction-specific rules in our playbooks, not hardcoded in the prompt — so that Austria and Switzerland keep their own rules.

What our AI checks in three minutes

  • Deadline and date of service — we read out the service annotation and create an entry for you in the deadline manager.
  • Formal mandatory details — reference number, authority, right-to-appeal notice, correct address.
  • The allegation and the evidence — a plausibility check against typical sources of measurement error.
  • A risk assessment — a rough estimate of how likely an objection is to succeed — and when the clear recommendation is: hand it to a specialist lawyer for traffic law.

What the AI does not do

  • It does not replace legal representation in fine or criminal proceedings.
  • It does not examine technical measurement records in detail — that requires expert witnesses.
  • It does not promise any particular outcome.

Have your notice checked now: /app/vault · Traffic law: /rechtsgebiete/verkehrsrecht · What the AI can't do: /system-grenzen

Lexi, digitale Rechts-Assistenz

Ready to clarify your matter?

{n} credits free. No credit card required. Ready in 2 minutes.

Start free now

No credit card required · GDPR-compliant · Start for free

Start free
No credit card
Get started