In one sentence
The case file now shows not only facts and relationships, but also what happened when (chronology) and what is proven and what is missing (evidence matrix) — and in Lex & Lexi you can give each side its own AI model.
Chronology: the file as a timeline
The new Chronology tab in every case file lines up the dated events — contract signed, a letter received, a deadline expiring, a hearing, a payment — into a timeline. It is not a new data store: events are facts in the fact graph, linked to the parties and to the source document. You confirm or reject AI suggestions just like in the relationship graph, and the time-travel selector shows "how the file stood when the claim was filed".
Evidence: what is proven, what is missing
The Evidence tab maps the supporting and the contradicting evidence to each claim — with a status of present / weak / missing / contested and the concrete gap. Missing points turn into a client request with one click. The burden of proof becomes visible before the other side makes it so.
New agents
- Reply preparation: From an opposing brief, the AI drafts a reply outline with attack points and burden-of-proof risks — as a DOCX in the file, checked by the citation guard and ready to hand off to the brief agent. The inbox triage recognises opposing briefs and offers the reply directly.
- Set up the file: One click starts the full first pass — read in, summarise, fact graph, chronology, evidence analysis and completeness.
Lex & Lexi: Claude vs. Gemini
Two AIs arguing against each other are strongest when they think differently. So in a debate's setup you can assign each side its own model — e.g. Claude for one, Gemini or GPT for the other. Especially in the pro-and-contra debate, the brief review and the memo this adds real diversity. All models run over our EU gateway; models without EU data residency are automatically replaced by the plan model in EU operation.
Guided start in the assistant
For a vague request ("make a contract") or a document upload without a clear instruction, the assistant now first asks what you want — with choice buttons and fitting action suggestions, across up to three short rounds. If the request is already specific, it gets to work right away.
Staying honest
All of this is an assistance system, not an organ of the administration of justice. It thinks along, checks and reminds — the assessment, the strategy and every brief remain the lawyer's responsibility. That's why you see every step, approve suggestions and stay in control. More: AI transparency.
Not on board yet? For lawyers shows the way in.
