What will the opposing party argue? (Moot Court)
Have the likely objections of the opposing party determined in advance – including a proposal on how you should respond.
A good lawsuit is not won by someone who only knows their own perspective – but by someone who anticipates the opposing party. In the cockpit, the AI anticipates what the other side is likely to argue and suggests a rebuttal for each point.
What you get
- Likely objections of the opposing party (e.g., denial, Verjährung (statute of limitations), Erfüllung (performance), Aufrechnung (set-off), lack of evidence) – with a brief assessment of why they matter.
- Your potential response to each objection.
- Weak points of your own case that you should know before the opposing party does.
- Tips for preparing for the oral hearing.
How to use it
Incorporate the strong rebuttals into your pleading and close evidentiary gaps in the evidence manager. This way, you will not be caught off guard during the hearing.
The analysis is an AI assessment and can be incorrect – cited norms are checked, but you must verify them yourself. See Limits of AI & No Legal Advice. It does not replace legal advice (Is this legal advice? The legal framework).
The entry-level plan includes several analyses per proceeding (the "n of N remaining" counter on the button shows your current status); a new analysis is worthwhile if facts or evidence have changed.
Related topics: Drafting, reviewing, and finalizing a pleading · Collecting and Properly Presenting Evidence · Settlement or continuing the dispute? How to decide · When to Choose a Lawyer Over AI?
Was this article helpful?
