In one sentence
The new exhibits tab in the case file assigns consecutive exhibit numbers to your DMS documents, spots exhibits that are mentioned in the pleading but still missing — and finally bundles cover sheet, exhibit index and all files into one complete set.
The most thankless work before filing
Every court pleading lives on its exhibits — and hardly any task is more error-prone than managing them: assigning K numbers, keeping the index, checking that every exhibit cited in the text is actually enclosed. In the worst case, an exhibit mentioned in the pleading but never filed only comes to light when the other side points it out. Exactly this work is now handled by the exhibit manager.
Numbering the way your court expects
In the case file's new “Exhibits” tab, you assign documents from the DMS as exhibits — with the prefix that matches your role, following the numbering convention used before German courts: K for the claimant side (Kläger), B for the defendant side (Beklagter), or a prefix of your own. The system assigns the consecutive number within each prefix; a document can also be assigned as an exhibit directly via right-click in the DMS.
Mentioned but not enclosed? That now surfaces before filing
The manager reads your pleading and checks which exhibits are mentioned in the text but missing from the assignment. The how matters to us: this detection is a pure text heuristic — deterministic code, no language model. It therefore returns the same result every time, incurs no AI costs and does not pass your pleading through any model for this check. The pleading agent uses it too: after every draft, missing exhibits are automatically created as placeholders and reported to you as one single, bundled suggestion — no notification spam.
One click, one bundle
Finally, the manager brings everything together: cover sheet, an automatically generated exhibit index and all files in the correct order as a ZIP bundle. The bundling runs entirely in your browser.
Part of a bigger whole
The exhibit manager closes the gap between the case-file DMS and the finished pleading. Together with multi-document field extraction and the fact graph, this creates a continuous path from an unsorted case file to a bundle ready for filing. More at For lawyers.
