In one sentence
The case file now shows not only facts and relationships, but also what happened when (chronology) and what is substantiated and what is missing (evidence matrix) — and in Lex & Lexi you can give each side its own AI model.
Chronology: the case file as a timeline
The new Chronology tab in every case file lines up the dated events — conclusion of a contract, receipt of a letter, expiry of a deadline, hearing, payment — into a timeline. This is not a new data silo: events are facts in the fact graph, linked to the parties involved and to the supporting document. You confirm or dismiss AI suggestions just as in the relationship graph, and via the time-travel view you can see "this is how the file stood when the claim was filed".
Evidence: what is proven, what is missing
The Evidence tab assigns to each claim the supporting and the contradicting evidence — with a status of present / weak / missing / contradicted and the specific gap. Missing items become a client query with a single click. That way the burden of proof becomes visible before the other side makes it so.
New agents
- Opponent response: From an opposing pleading, a reply outline is produced with points of attack and burden-of-proof risks — as a DOCX in the case file, checked by the citation guardian and ready to hand over to the pleading agent. The inbox triage recognises opposing pleadings and suggests the reply directly.
- Set up case file: A single click kicks off the entire first pass — ingestion, summarisation, fact graph, chronology, evidence analysis and completeness.
Lex & Lexi: Claude against Gemini
Two AIs arguing against each other are at their strongest when they think differently. That is why, when setting up a debate, you can assign each side its own model — e.g. Claude for one, Gemini or GPT for the other. In the adversarial exchange, the pleading review and the memo in particular, this brings real diversity. All models run through our EU gateway; models without EU data residency are automatically replaced by your plan's model in EU operation.
A guided start in the assistant
Given a vague prompt ("Draft a contract") or a document upload without clear instructions, the assistant now first asks what you would like — with selection buttons and matching suggested actions, over up to three short rounds. If the request is already specific, it gets to work straight away.
Staying honest
All of this is an assistance system, not an organ of the administration of justice. It thinks alongside you, checks and reminds — the assessment, the strategy and every pleading remain the lawyer's responsibility. In return, you see every step, confirm suggestions and stay in control. More on this: AI transparency.
Not on board yet? For lawyers shows how to get started.
