Skip to main content

Lex & Lexi debate · thinking sparring

A second mind — and a third.

Lex and Lexi are two AI agents that think your case through from opposing angles — formal and procedural versus practical and unconventional. You see the main line and the risks before the court does.

Hybrid debate

Argument versus counter-argument

Instead of a smooth answer you get a dispute: Lex holds the formal line, Lexi hunts for the gaps and the unconventional alternative. Several modes — analysis, strategy, weakness-hunting, counter-argument.

  • Two voices, one case — you moderate the debate.
  • Modes for every phase: analysis, strategy, weaknesses, reply.
  • With case context, client-separated (RLS); the hand-off to the model is pseudonymized here.
Lex

Formally: the claim should be dismissed for want of coherent pleading on service.

Lexi

Too smooth. The court may assume service by prima facie evidence — we need a second line.

Lex

Agreed: primary motion for dismissal, alternatively signal willingness to settle.

Lexi

And we secure the service question via the witness before the hearing is scheduled.

Live hearing coach

A prompter in the hearing

During the hearing the coach supplies the next question, the fitting provision and the reply to a surprise submission — brief, in real time, without throwing you off your rhythm.

  • Quick prompts instead of long opinions.
  • Asks back when the facts are unclear — rather than guessing.
The other side now submits: service was effected by registered letter drop.
Clarification

Briefly, to place this: do you have the delivery receipt or only the posting receipt? That decides the constructive-service question.

The posting receipt alone doesn't prove service — contest service and point to the missing delivery confirmation.
From debate to document

Straight into the pleading — with provenance

Once the line is clear, you turn the debate into a draft pleading or contract in the Canvas editor with one click. Every statement taken over carries its origin from the debate — traceable, not free-floating.

  • Debate → draft with no copy-paste break.
  • Adopted arguments keep their provenance.
Handover to pleadingwith provenance
  • Main line: dismissal (from debate, Lex)
  • Alternative motion: settlement readiness (from debate, Lexi)
  • Offer of evidence: witness on service

Agents in this workflow

Dual-agent debate in several modes — a hybrid of argument and counter-argument, transferable straight into a pleading or contract.

Lex & Lexi debate engine

A second opinion as from an experienced colleague — a structured assessment of strategy and risks.

Senior consult agent

Chat bridge: from the debate seamlessly into the assistant with case context and model tiers.

AI assistant

Control & safety

  • Lex & Lexi provide suggestions — the decision and the courtroom stay yours.
  • Case context stays client-separated (RLS); names and contact details reach the model pseudonymized.
  • Adopted arguments are backed by their origin, not invented.
  • EU hosting, no AI training on your data, multilingual.
Lex, your digital companion on the platform

Let your case files think along.

The AI lawyer portal — EU-hosted, profession-compliant, client-separated. You keep control, the AI does the groundwork.

Book a demo

No-obligation inquiry, no contract commitment.

See all lawyer features

Lex & Lexi

You ask. Lex or Lexi shows what Smart Legal Pro can do.

Product guidance right on the page — features, pricing and the best way to start.

For law firms
Get started for firms