An assistant that asks back — and a second mind.
The AI assistant works with your case fact graph — switchable via „Include case fact graph“ — as well as model tiers and attachments, and asks back when something is unclear instead of guessing. Lex & Lexi provide two voices: argument and counter-argument.
Ask back instead of hallucinating
When a request is ambiguous, the assistant asks targeted questions before drafting — so no false assumptions arise. With case context, model tiers (Auto/Quick/Standard/Premium) and attachments.
- Targeted follow-up questions when unclear.
- Case context and attachments per thread.
- Model tiers per task — export as Markdown.
- The assistant can search facts already extracted from the case file at no AI-quota cost — only when that isn't enough does it read the original document again, which does use quota.
Before I draft: is receipt of the termination on 14 Mar undisputed, or are we contesting the date? That changes the line of defence.
Argument and counter-argument
Two AI voices debate your case: Lex formal and procedural, Lexi practical and unconventional. So you see the main line and the risks before the court does.
- Hybrid debate in several modes (analysis, strategy …).
- From the debate straight into a brief/contract — with provenance.
Formally: the claim should be dismissed for lack of conclusive pleading on receipt.
Risky — the court could assume receipt via prima facie evidence. Second line: prepare a severance settlement in the alternative.
Agreed: primary motion to dismiss, signal willingness to settle in the alternative.
Sourced, not invented
On request, the assistant backs its answer with sources and lists references. Whatever is not verifiable is marked as such.
- References with a source instead of free-floating claims.
- Unverifiable items are flagged, not asserted.
- § 4 KSchG — statute confirmed
- § 130 BGB — statute confirmed
- BAG on deemed receipt — check the reference before use
Agents in this workflow
AI assistant with persistent threads, case context, model tiers, attachments and Markdown export.
Dual-agent debate (Lex & Lexi) in several modes — transferable straight into a brief/contract.
A second opinion like an experienced colleague — a structured assessment of strategy and risks.
Control & safety
- The assistant asks back instead of inventing assumptions.
- Answers are sourceable; unverifiable items are marked.
- Case context stays client-separated (RLS).
- EU hosting, multilingual. The interactive assistant works with clear names; pseudonymisation applies to the agents named for it.
Let your case files think along.
The AI lawyer portal — EU-hosted, profession-compliant, client-separated. You keep control, the AI does the groundwork.