Check T&C clauses — identify invalid provisions
Exclusion of liability, notice period, automatic contract renewal — not every clause in standard terms and conditions is valid.
No credit card · 10 credits free · Cancel anytime
Quick check: what should you do?
3 short questions — no sign-up required.
Deadline at a glance
Ideally before signing or before a notice period expires
§§ 305–310 BGB
There is no statutory deadline for the review itself — what matters is identifying critical clauses (especially notice periods and automatic renewals) in good time.
It is an AI, not a person: nobody looks at your individual case, and we do not know who signs up or for what reason. That is why we give pointers, but no legal advice on the individual case. Guidelines and playbooks in the platform are only guardrails: the AI relies on the available sources and your information. AI can make mistakes — check important results, and if in doubt, ask a lawyer.
What we pay special attention to
Curated from real cases. The AI review flags exactly these points in your document.
Automatic contract renewals with a short objection period are frequently overlooked.
Blanket exclusions of liability are often invalid (§ 309 Nr. 7 BGB).
Jurisdiction clauses against consumers are usually invalid.
What you can do here in 5 minutes
Standard terms and conditions (AGB) are subject to statutory content review (§§ 305–310 BGB). Surprising clauses, an unreasonable disadvantage or a non-transparent notice period can be invalid — even if they appear in the signed contract.
Upload the contract/T&Cs — we flag conspicuous clauses (liability, termination, automatic renewal, place of jurisdiction) and classify them legally.
Results in three steps
Upload the T&Cs
Contract or separate T&Cs as PDF/photo.
Clause check
Review against §§ 305–310 BGB: transparency, surprise, unreasonable disadvantage.
Classification
A clear assessment of which clauses can be challenged — with references.
- Upload the T&Cs – Contract or separate T&Cs as PDF/photo.
- Clause check – Review against §§ 305–310 BGB: transparency, surprise, unreasonable disadvantage.
- Classification – A clear assessment of which clauses can be challenged — with references.
- No court enforcement of invalidity.
- No review of your own T&Cs as the user of the terms (see the separate use case “Review supplier T&Cs”).
- No review of individually negotiated terms outside the T&C clauses.
Transparency
What the AI checks — and what only a lawyer can decide
An AI is only as good as the question. We show openly where your answer is reliable and where you should speak with a lawyer.
Where the amount in dispute is high or the contract creates a long-term, economically significant commitment.
More letters & checks
Consumer law · Create your own B2B T&Cs with AI · Have a contract reviewed · Template letter: requested contract amendments
- Fine noticeAccused of a regulatory offense? At 2 weeks, the objection period is considerably shorter than for most other official decisions.
- Health insurer refusesTherapy, medical aid or rehabilitation refused? Often the insurer has missed its own response deadline — in which case the benefit is already deemed approved.
- Care level objectionThe long-term care insurer almost always follows the assessment of the Medical Service — if you object, you should check it module by module.
- Road traffic accidentAfter an accident, the other party’s insurer often settles too little — complete heads of damage and the correct liability ratio are worth a close look.
